Monday, June 16, 2008

so i thought that i thought about poverty until last saturday, when we were asked not only to explore government housing on the west bank (of new orleans, not palestine) but take pictures of it, also.  the project was difficult for a number of reasons: first, i was thrust far, far out of my downy privilege-bubble; second, the conditions i photographed are inexplicably devastating; and third, it was considered a "valuable" and even "constructive" activity despite its obvious levels of intrusiveness and overt disregard for individual (and community) privacy.

maybe i should clarify the final point: i have no doubt that this was a valuable and constructive activity for the Corps Members (that's me and my twenty-nine fellow volunteers), but i'm struggling with whether or not it was done at the expense of the community members, who were fully aware of our presence and our purpose. the GYAC higher-ups say not, because we are coming back into the community to do a service-learning project, and, besides, "they're used to people doing stuff like this." hm.

that said, i'm going to post some of the pictures i took.  keep in mind that this community is nowhere near the base level of poverty that exists all over new orleans.

...FUCK MY IMAGES WON'T UPLOAD
i'll do it soon promise

2 comments:

evie said...

they're 'used to people doing stuff like this'?
i mean, technically that's a totally legitimate statement, since they are used to being exploited and maltreated by stereotypes and the government, and i'm sure they're already used to being publicly milked for their image in order for us cushy middle-classers to learn a valuable lesson about the impoverished. i mean, we're going back in to help them, they can at least sacrifice a little dignity for us!

aghhhhhhhhhhhhh.
but i can't say anything because that's just another perspective from the cushy middle class. ooo, ask some people in the community how they feel. then if they don't mind then everything is ok, because the only reason the higher-up's statement pissed me off was because s/he had no regard for the feelings of the community, but i was being a hypocrite because neither do i, and maybe they actually appreciate the attention.

i love you, and i love that your heart is always in the right place to be there when someone else's isn't

ALSO. i think i am 6 hours in front of EST and thus 7 hours in front of CST, but it could be 5 hours in front of EST.
also, do you have an address? i'm sending your great family a post card, but i want to send you BFF letters and stuff that aren't really appropriate for the public setting of a postcard or family members.

i love you. right now it's 8:54 AM in germany, if that helps at all.
sorry my comment was like an essay.

evie said...

ALSO ARGH i keep making a distinction between the cushy middle class and the impoverished, and there should be no distinction because we're all human.
you should replace every i, you, s/he and they with a 'we'. or even better, replace them with: 'our brother and sisterhood of humanity as a whole regardless of socioeconomic status as well as a myriad of other unimportant statuses'.

yes, that sounds much better.
i love you.